We use analytics to improve Pollar and, with your consent, the Meta pixel to measure sign-ups and purchases that come from our ads. You can change this anytime in Settings. Privacy policy

Search⌘K
HomeFor YouLiveBriefAsk
MapMarketsThreadsSoundsFilms
DomesticGeopoliticsEconomySocietyScience & TechInfrastructureSportCultureLifestyle
Support PollarNotifications
PrivacyNewsroom
HomeBriefLiveThreadsSearch
Listen to the article2 min, read by a synthetic voice

In brief

  • Waldemar Żurek sent the fifth request to lift Grzegorz Braun's immunity to European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, announcing it on X on Friday, 16 October 2026.

  • Prosecutors say Braun publicly denied Nazi genocide at Auschwitz-Birkenau, including gas chamber murders, in an online broadcast on 25 August, an offence punishable by up to three years in prison.

  • Prosecutors state that Braun's 25 August statements were not connected with exercising his mandate as an MEP, so parliamentary activity protection does not apply.

  • On 25 August a prosecutor from the Kraków branch of the Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation charged Braun with public denial, and proceedings were later opened ex officio.

How it came to this
  1. 25 AugBraun makes statements during an online broadcast after questioning in Kraków and is charged the same day
  2. 16 OctJustice minister Żurek sends the fifth request to lift Braun's immunity to Roberta Metsola

The request

Justice minister and prosecutor general Waldemar Żurek has sent European Parliament President Roberta Metsola a request to lift the immunity of Grzegorz Braun, MEP and leader of Konfederacja Korony Polskiej. Żurek announced the move on X on Friday, 16 October 2026, calling it the fifth request of this kind against Braun in connection with ongoing criminal proceedings. Because of his immunity as an MEP, prosecuting Braun requires the consent of the European Parliament.

“Immunity does not serve to protect Auschwitz liars.”

Waldemar Żurek, justice minister and prosecutor general

The statements at issue

The case concerns remarks Braun made on 25 August during an online broadcast, directly after he left questioning at the IPN investigation department in Kraków. Prosecutors say he publicly denied, against the facts, the genocide committed at the German Nazi camp Auschwitz-Birkenau, including the murder of people in gas chambers. The offence is punishable by up to three years in prison. Prosecutors argue the remarks had nothing to do with his mandate, so parliamentary protection for activity linked to his mandate does not cover them.

Charges and proceedings

The Kraków branch of the Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation charged Braun with public denial of Nazi crimes on the same day as the broadcast. Braun did not admit guilt at that point, but he did not deny that he had said the words in question. Prosecutors have since opened proceedings on their own initiative over the statements.

“Such words have nothing to do with exercising an MEP's mandate. This is an offence prosecuted ex officio.”

Waldemar Żurek, justice minister and prosecutor general

What comes next

The request now sits with the European Parliament, whose consent is required before criminal proceedings against Braun can move forward. The request is the fifth of its kind, which places it among a series of immunity requests linked to separate criminal cases against the MEP.

Next in today’s edition

Zacharia reportedly out as White House press secretary

On Friday, 16 October, Donald Trump said he had urged Katie Zacharia to reconsider her role, while the New York Times reported she had been fired. Her debut briefing had lasted about 14 minutes and followed questions about her legal credentials.

  • Safety · 9 h agoOregon elementary shooting leaves four dead, attacker killed by bystander
  • Business · 9 h agoTesla shows flying Roadster, production targeted for 2028
  • Health & Education · 11 h agoPope Leo XIV recovers from lung surgery, Angelus planned Sunday

In this text

The requestThe requestThe statements at issueThe statements at issueCharges and proceedingsCharges and proceedingsWhat comes nextWhat comes next

Where

Sources and context

  • wpolityce.pl17 h agoŻurek does not let up on Braun. This is already the fifth such request!Żurek nie odpuszcza Braunowi. To już piąty taki wniosek! · original in Polish
  • TVP Info17 h agoLifting Grzegorz Braun's immunity. This is already the fifth requestUchylenie immunitetu Grzegorza Brauna. To już piąty wniosek · original in Polish
  • rmf24.pl18 h agoThere is another request regarding Grzegorz Braun's immunityJest kolejny wniosek ws. immunitetu Grzegorza Brauna · original in Polish
Waldemar Żurek
Justice minister and prosecutor general who filed the fifth request to lift Braun's immunity
Grzegorz Braun
MEP and leader of Konfederacja Korony Polskiej whose immunity is the subject of the request
Roberta Metsola
President of the European Parliament, to whom the request was sent
Kraków
Kraków · Poland

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar

Published yesterday at 10:06.

Report an error in the text

Text generated by AI from the reports of the publishers listed and checked automatically, with no human editor. How Pollar is made

Kraków

Based on reports by

wpolityce.pl, TVP Info, rmf24.pl

List of sources
Photo: Zalasem1, CC BY 4.0 (Wikimedia Commons, cropped)

Government · Kraków

Żurek asks European Parliament to lift Braun's immunity, fifth request over Auschwitz remarks

Justice minister Waldemar Żurek has asked European Parliament President Roberta Metsola to lift the immunity of MEP Grzegorz Braun over remarks he made on 25 August. Prosecutors say the remarks denied Nazi genocide at Auschwitz-Birkenau and carry a penalty of up to three years in prison.

AI text based on reports by wpolityce.pl, TVP Info and rmf24.pl. Published yesterday at 10:06.

Ask about this text

Ask your own question
What is the maximum penalty for the remarks made by Grzegorz Braun?
Why do prosecutors claim parliamentary immunity does not apply in this case?
How it is made