
ZDF issues cease-and-desist declaration after Elon Musk threatens legal action over Belfast riot report
Germany's public broadcaster ZDF has issued a cease-and-desist declaration and removed a segment from its June 12 broadcast after the US billionaire threatened legal action over claims he called for a 'hunt on migrants' during Belfast riots.
The legal dispute
Germany's public broadcaster ZDF issued a cease-and-desist declaration on June 16 after Elon Musk, through his Hamburg-based lawyer Joachim Nikolaus Steinhöfel, threatened legal action over a news segment broadcast four days earlier. The broadcaster removed the disputed passage and acknowledged the original wording was "imprecise and therefore misleading." ZDF told the Catholic News Agency KNA that Musk had demanded the declaration via a German law firm and that the broadcaster had complied before the Thursday deadline set in the cease-and-desist letter.
What was published is no longer a minor mistake. It also fits into a pattern of incidents that raise the question of what is going wrong inside that organisation.
The Belfast broadcast
The segment, aired on "ZDF heute live" on June 12 under the title "Riots in Belfast: How Musk fuels the protests," covered violent far-right riots that erupted in the Northern Irish capital following a knife attack. The presenter stated that "a racist mob is hunting migrants" and that the calls had come from "a British far-right extremist and tech billionaire Elon Musk." After Musk announced legal steps, ZDF added a clarifying note on June 13, then removed the introduction entirely on June 16 with a note citing "legal reasons."
The claim that our client called for a 'hunt on migrants' by a 'racist mob' is obviously untrue.
The riots and Musk's post
The violence in Belfast followed a June 8 knife attack in which a Sudanese man attempted to decapitate a passerby on the street, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. The victim was seriously injured and lost an eye, British police reported. Cars and houses were set on fire during the subsequent riots, and residents had to be evacuated. British far-right activist Tommy Robinson and Rupert Lowe, chairman of the far-right Restore UK party, called for street protests. Musk shared Robinson's post on X, adding: "Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change!!" The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) estimated the three accounts' posts were viewed roughly 115 million times, with 55 percent of the views attributed to Musk's account.
- Sudanese man commits knife attack in Belfast; victim seriously injured, loses an eye according to police
- ZDF broadcasts 'heute live' segment stating Musk called for a 'hunt on migrants' alongside far-right activist Tommy Robinson
- ZDF adds clarifying note to the broadcast, calling the original wording 'imprecise and misleading'
- Musk's lawyer sends cease-and-desist letter; ZDF complies, issues declaration, and removes the disputed passage
Political fallout
The dispute drew in German politics when Alice Weidel, co-leader of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), expressed support for Musk on Tuesday. Musk himself called the ZDF report "outrageous lies" on X and announced he would take legal action. Steinhöfel, in an interview with the Berliner Zeitung, argued the broadcaster had "crossed a line" and that the incident reflected broader institutional problems at ZDF. He described the statements as "defamatory, disparaging, and journalistically unacceptable," particularly given ZDF's status as a publicly funded, state-adjacent broadcaster.
What comes next
ZDF's swift compliance with the cease-and-desist demand appears to have averted an immediate court battle, though Steinhöfel indicated in his interview that further steps were not currently being discussed. The broadcaster told the Frankfurter Allgemeine that it had accepted the terms "readily and before the deadline." Whether the episode will trigger broader debate about editorial standards at Germany's public broadcasters remains unresolved. The incident also highlights the tension between wealthy platform owners and legacy media outlets in disputes over reporting on online speech.
This has nothing to do with journalism. It is precisely the kind of behaviour this broadcaster otherwise accuses its political opponents of.

