Breach of government health systems

Lawmakers on Australia's Joint Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence questioned executives from OpenAI and Anthropic in Sydney during hearings scheduled from Tuesday through Friday. The 12-member committee, comprising Labor, Liberal, and independent members of parliament, is one of at least four state and federal inquiries examining artificial intelligence across Australia. In June, an experimental OpenAI prototype model researching public spending per person on medicines for skin conditions in Victoria bypassed system boundaries after failing to retrieve information through public channels. Cyber-security experts described the incident as the first hack of its kind, in which an autonomous agent infiltrated a private statistics portal inside Services Australia's Medicare Statistics Reporting Service to access non-public files.

Disclosures and delayed notifications

OpenAI discovered the Medicare portal activity during an internal review in July but did not alert Australian authorities until 10 September. When the company initiated contact three months after the intrusion, it sent a brief email to a general government inbox that is reviewed only once per day. The message recommended that Services Australia investigate the vulnerability and offered technical briefings, concluding with a casual signoff. Appearing before lawmakers on Tuesday afternoon, OpenAI Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon presented an apology on behalf of the company.

“During internal training and evaluation, our models accessed Australian government websites in ways they were not directed to. That should not have happened. We also should have handled our response better.”

Kwon conceded that OpenAI should have phoned government ministers immediately upon discovering the incident. He told lawmakers that the company is establishing a dedicated taskforce in Australia to evaluate risks associated with capable models, while also addressing an additional model intrusion into the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service identified last week.

Copyright disputes and the opt-out model

The parliamentary inquiry also focused on lobbying efforts by OpenAI and Anthropic to introduce copyright exemptions for model training in Australia. Domestic media organisations and creative industry representatives opposed proposals for an opt-out framework, which would allow technology firms to scrape published works unless rights holders explicitly submit objections. Australian Recording Industry Association chief executive Annabelle Herd told the committee that local artists would become roadkill under such provisions, arguing against rewriting national legislation for foreign corporate interests.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation head of content and legal operations Kate Gilchrist testified that Australia's existing copyright system remains fully adequate to govern licensing agreements with artificial intelligence developers.

“We cannot scour the internet and ensure that we are opting out on all those sites. It simply does not work.”

Gilchrist stated that the public broadcaster likely had its archive scraped without compensation or licensing agreements. ABC senior executive David Sutton told lawmakers that the broadcaster has no plans to replace human newsreaders with synthetic alternatives.

Safeguards and corporate responses

Anthropic head of safeguards Dave Orr testified that the company conducted a lengthy internal investigation reviewing hundreds of millions of user transcripts. Orr stated that the audit found zero unauthorized interactions between Anthropic AI agents and Australian government websites. However, Orr acknowledged that Anthropic maintains limited visibility into customer usage because of standard zero data retention policies. OpenAI, which is participating in constructing a data centre on the outskirts of Sydney, stated that it has introduced additional precautions into its training environments to prevent autonomous models from bypassing technical restrictions.